The U.S. economy is now enjoying its longest economic expansion in history. As of July 2019, the United States surpassed its previous expansion period record of ten years which occurred from 1991 to 2001. This is remarkable considering an average economic expansion cycle lasts roughly four to five years. Like Independence Day, that is truly worth celebrating! However, many are now pondering the question, “how much gas is left in the expansion tank?”
Although U.S. economic expansion continues, the actual rate of growth is declining. Second quarter Gross Domestic Product is projected to decrease roughly 50% from the first quarter GDP increase of 3.1%. This type of decline in growth usually produces a more volatile market with increased fears of the economic expansion coming to an end. In response to these recent trends, the Federal Reserve recently re-emphasized that their primary objective is to support economic growth especially in the near term. In order to achieve this when growth is on the decline, the Federal Reserve will typically start adjusting their monetary policy by cutting interest rates. Changing monetary policy is much harder when the Fed is trying to spur growth rather than adjusting policy to limit growth. Although market analysts are currently divided on exactly what the Fed should do next, the bond and equity markets have already priced in multiple interest rate cuts from the Fed between now and the end of the year. The 10-year Treasury rate declined to 1.96% on July 3, 2019, which is the first time it’s fallen below 2.00% since November 8, 2016. The general consensus is that interest rates will remain low for the foreseeable future.

Even though the U.S. is experiencing a decline in economic growth, we are still well positioned compared to many other countries around the globe. However, we are mindful the outlook could deteriorate if the U.S. can’t resolve its trading disputes with some of our major trade partners, especially China. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell commented on this topic recently stating, “The global risk picture has changed, really just in the last six to eight weeks. And it’s around trade developments and concerns about global growth.” For over a year now, the U.S. and China have been attempting to work out trade differences with no resolution yet in hand. Many U.S. company profits have already been squeezed by the retaliatory tariffs, causing them to downgrade their future earnings forecasts. It’s difficult to gauge when or if these trade wars will get resolved, but it’s clear the Trump administration is highly motivated to work out these trade agreements prior to the 2020 Presidential election.
On July 5th, the U.S. employment report for June was released, reflecting a much stronger labor market than what was initially anticipated. The labor report helps support the case that our economy is slowing down but certainly is not sinking. Instead of the aforementioned forecast of multiple interest rate cuts through the end of the year, many now believe the Fed will most likely cut rates only once in the last half of 2019. In any event, it appears the Fed will continue to be patient in adjusting their monetary policy and won’t make any significant moves unless there is consistent data to justify any changes.
Click here to read the entire 2019 Q3 MMB
Article provided by Zac Saldi
Government Capital Corporation
Over the past quarter, the Federal Reserve has turned a complete 180 degrees on their monetary policy and plans for future interest rates. You may recall, on December 19th last year, the Fed raised interest rates for the ninth time since 2015 and also penciled in two to three more anticipated rate increases for 2019. This move by the Fed was largely questioned by many economists who thought the Fed was being overly optimistic about U.S. economic growth and underestimating the effects of various global economic uncertainties. In December, the S&P 500 dropped over 10% and the ten-year U. S. Treasury note started this year 68 basis points lower than in early November. This sharp decline in the U.S. equity markets prompted the Fed to release a subsequent statement well before their next regularly scheduled policy meeting, stating that they plan to be patient on any future interest rate increases. This news apparently provided a temporary fix for the stock market as the U.S. equity markets rebounded nicely in the first quarter of 2019, erasing the December losses.
There is a common saying in sports, that “winning solves all problems”. However, when losses start to accumulate, what’s been overshadowed for so long comes under scrutiny. During 2018, the U.S. experienced GDP growth peaking at 4.2%, unemployment declined to a 49-year low, oil prices hit a 4-year high, the 10-year Treasury was up as high as 3.24% along with overall increases in consumer spending and corporate profits. So, why did 2018 end with so much economic uncertainty and volatility in the debt and equity markets? With almost all those positive trends now in the rear view mirror, many are voicing opinions on what or who is to blame for the volatile fourth quarter.
So far in 2018, the U.S. economy has picked up right where it left off in Q4 of 2017 with growth reaching a 6 year high. The big question is whether this growth is sustainable and how federal policy makers will react?
Currently, the difference between short term rates and long term rates are very small compared to historical standards. The gap between the yield on the 10 year treasury and the 2 year treasury has declined to 30 basis points, the smallest gap since August 2007. The gap is even smaller when you compare maturities past 10 years (yield curve chart below). This is causing banks to invest more in short term paper because they can get almost the same yield as they would with a longer maturity, but with a much less risk. This has caused banks to require more yield on longer term transactions.